<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>D-Photo and The Photographer &#187; Olympus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:17:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-P1 &#8211; Review &#8211; 32</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-p1-review-32</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-p1-review-32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus. E-P1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=6674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harley Ogier tests the retro-chic EP-1 Look and Feel Camera manufacturers exist in a flurried blur of technological change, so it’s nice to see someone <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-p1-review-32"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-p1-review-32/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus FE 340 &#8211; Review &#8211; 24</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-fe-340-review-24</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-fe-340-review-24#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FE 340]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=6517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Olympus announced it would up the standard zoom on its entry-level models from 3x to 5x I got excited… then it built the FE-340 <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-fe-340-review-24"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-fe-340-review-24/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E3 &#8211; Review &#8211; 23</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e3-review-23</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e3-review-23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=6452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to dSLR innovation, Olympus has led the field, introducing sensor cleaning and live view functions well ahead of the opposition. Now the <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e3-review-23"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e3-review-23/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-520 &#8211; Review &#8211; 28</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-520-review-28</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-520-review-28#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=6422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phil Hanson says that, despite feeling a little plasticy, the E-520 has plenty of grunt under the hood Olympus became the first major manufacturer to <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-520-review-28"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-520-review-28/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olyumpus MJU 1010 Review &#8211; 027</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olyumpus-mju-1010-review-027</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olyumpus-mju-1010-review-027#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MJU 1010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=6386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big things can come in small packages, as Phil Hanson discovers with the Olympus MJU 1010 Compact cameras such as the Olympus MJU 1010 serve <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olyumpus-mju-1010-review-027"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olyumpus-mju-1010-review-027/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus SP-570UZ Review &#8211; 025</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-sp-570uz-review-025</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-sp-570uz-review-025#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 05:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus SP-570UZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SP570UZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=6292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Olympus has maintained the lead in the race to have the biggest lens in the super-zoom war. The SP570UZ has upped the ante to 20x <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-sp-570uz-review-025"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-sp-570uz-review-025/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-500 &#8211; 012</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-500-012</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-500-012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-500]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=4424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The digital SLR market is a cut-throat industry; if you want to survive you have to have a competitive edge. Canon and Nikon seem stable <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-500-012"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-e-500-012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus AZ-1 Review &#8211; 002</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-az-1-review-002</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-az-1-review-002#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=4368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  The first thing that grabbed my attention was the Olympus AZ-1’s size, or rather lack of. Measuring just 94x67x22mm and weighing  160g, this 3.2-megapixel <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-az-1-review-002"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-az-1-review-002/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus Camedia C-310 Review &#8211; 001</title>
		<link>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-camedia-c-310-review-001</link>
		<comments>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-camedia-c-310-review-001#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D-Photo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dphoto.co.nz/?p=4254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the great days of film cameras, Olympus was one of the most respected manufacturers around. A lot of that was due to its <a href="http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-camedia-c-310-review-001"> ...full story</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dphoto.co.nz/reviews/olympus-camedia-c-310-review-001/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
